Phylogeography of mtDNA haplogroup R7 in the Indian peninsula
Chaubey GPapers in this archive, Karmin MPapers in this archive, Metspalu EPapers in this archive, Metspalu MPapers in this archive, Selvi-Rani DPapers in this archive, Singh VKPapers in this archive, Parik JPapers in this archive, Solnik APapers in this archive, Naidu BPPapers in this archive, Kumar APapers in this archive, Adarsh NPapers in this archive, Mallick CBPapers in this archive, Trivedi BPapers in this archive, Prakash SPapers in this archive, Reddy RPapers in this archive, Shukla PPapers in this archive, Bhagat SPapers in this archive, Verma SPapers in this archive, Vasnik SPapers in this archive, Khan IPapers in this archive, Barwa APapers in this archive, Sahoo DPapers in this archive, Sharma APapers in this archive, Rashid MPapers in this archive, Rashid MPapers in this archive, Chandra VPapers in this archive, Reddy AGPapers in this archive, Torroni APapers in this archive, Foley RAPapers in this archive, Thangaraj KPapers in this archive, Singh LPapers in this archive, Kivisild TPapers in this archive, Villems RPapers in this archive
Abstract
Background Human genetic diversity observed in Indian subcontinent is second only to that of Africa. This implies an early settlement and demographic growth soon after the first 'Out-of-Africa' dispersal of anatomically modern humans in Late Pleistocene. In contrast to this perspective, linguistic diversity in India has been thought to derive from more recent population movements and episodes of contact. With the exception of Dravidian, which origin and relatedness to other language phyla is obscure, all the language families in India can be linked to language families spoken in different regions of Eurasia. Mitochondrial DNA and Y chromosome evidence has supported largely local evolution of the genetic lineages of the majority of Dravidian and Indo-European speaking populations, but there is no consensus yet on the question of whether the Munda (Austro-Asiatic) speaking populations originated in India or derive from a relatively recent migration from further East. Results Here, we report the analysis of 35 novel complete mtDNA sequences from India which refine the structure of Indian-specific varieties of haplogroup R. Detailed analysis of haplogroup R7, coupled with a survey of ~12,000 mtDNAs from caste and tribal groups over the entire Indian subcontinent, reveals that one of its more recently derived branches (R7a1), is particularly frequent among Munda-speaking tribal groups. This branch is nested within diverse R7 lineages found among Dravidian and Indo-European speakers of India. We have inferred from this that a subset of Munda-speaking groups have acquired R7 relatively recently. Furthermore, we find that the distribution of R7a1 within the Munda-speakers is largely restricted to one of the sub-branches (Kherwari) of northern Munda languages. This evidence does not support the hypothesis that the Austro-Asiatic speakers are the primary source of the R7 variation. Statistical analyses suggest a significant correlation between genetic variation and geography, rather than between genes and languages. Conclusion Our high-resolution phylogeographic study, involving diverse linguistic groups in India, suggests that the high frequency of mtDNA haplogroup R7 among Munda speaking populations of India can be explained best by gene flow from linguistically different populations of Indian subcontinent. The conclusion is based on the observation that among Indo-Europeans, and particularly in Dravidians, the haplogroup is, despite its lower frequency, phylogenetically more divergent, while among the Munda speakers only one sub-clade of R7, i.e. R7a1, can be observed. It is noteworthy that though R7 is autochthonous to India, and arises from the root of hg R, its distribution and phylogeography in India is not uniform. This suggests the more ancient establishment of an autochthonous matrilineal genetic structure, and that isolation in the Pleistocene, lineage loss through drift, and endogamy of prehistoric and historic groups have greatly inhibited genetic homogenization and geographical uniformity.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.