Quantifying the legacy of the Chinese Neolithic on the maternal genetic heritage of Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia
Brandão APapers in this archive, Eng KKPapers in this archive, Rito TPapers in this archive, Cavadas BPapers in this archive, Bulbeck DPapers in this archive, Gandini FPapers in this archive, Pala MPapers in this archive, Mormina MPapers in this archive, Hudson BPapers in this archive, White JPapers in this archive, Ko TMPapers in this archive, Saidin MPapers in this archive, Zafarina ZPapers in this archive, Oppenheimer SPapers in this archive, Richards MBPapers in this archive, Pereira LPapers in this archive, Soares PPapers in this archive
Abstract
There has been a long-standing debate concerning the extent to which the spread of Neolithic ceramics and Malay-Polynesian languages in Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) were coupled to an agriculturally driven demic dispersal out of Taiwan 4000 years ago (4 ka). We previously addressed this question using founder analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control-region sequences to identify major lineage clusters most likely to have dispersed from Taiwan into ISEA, proposing that the dispersal had a relatively minor impact on the extant genetic structure of ISEA, and that the role of agriculture in the expansion of the Austronesian languages was therefore likely to have been correspondingly minor. Here we test these conclusions by sequencing whole mtDNAs from across Taiwan and ISEA, using their higher chronological precision to resolve the overall proportion that participated in the “out-of-Taiwan” mid-Holocene dispersal as opposed to earlier, postglacial expansions in the Early Holocene. We show that, in total, about 20 % of mtDNA lineages in the modern ISEA pool result from the “out-of-Taiwan” dispersal, with most of the remainder signifying earlier processes, mainly due to sea-level rises after the Last Glacial Maximum. Notably, we show that every one of these founder clusters previously entered Taiwan from China, 6–7 ka, where rice-farming originated, and remained distinct from the indigenous Taiwanese population until after the subsequent dispersal into ISEA. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00439-016-1640-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Keywords: Last Glacial Maximum, Sunda Shelf, Austronesian Language, Postglacial Expansion, Early Holocene Period
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.