What caused extinction of the Pleistocene megafauna of Sahul?
Johnson CNPapers in this archive, Alroy JPapers in this archive, Beeton NJPapers in this archive, Bird MIPapers in this archive, Brook BWPapers in this archive, Cooper APapers in this archive, Gillespie RPapers in this archive, Herrando-Pérez SPapers in this archive, Jacobs ZPapers in this archive, Miller GHPapers in this archive, Prideaux GJPapers in this archive, Roberts RGPapers in this archive, Rodríguez-Rey MPapers in this archive, Saltré FPapers in this archive, Turney CSPapers in this archive, Bradshaw CJPapers in this archive
Abstract
During the Pleistocene, Australia and New Guinea supported a rich assemblage of large vertebrates. Why these animals disappeared has been debated for more than a century and remains controversial. Previous synthetic reviews of this problem have typically focused heavily on particular types of evidence, such as the dating of extinction and human arrival, and have frequently ignored uncertainties and biases that can lead to misinterpretation of this evidence. Here, we review diverse evidence bearing on this issue and conclude that, although many knowledge gaps remain, multiple independent lines of evidence point to direct human impact as the most likely cause of extinction.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.