Spotted phenotypes in horses lost attractiveness in the Middle Ages
Wutke SPapers in this archive, Benecke NPapers in this archive, Sandoval-Castellanos EPapers in this archive, Döhle HJPapers in this archive, Friederich SPapers in this archive, Gonzalez JPapers in this archive, Hallsson JHPapers in this archive, Hofreiter MPapers in this archive, Lõugas LPapers in this archive, Magnell OPapers in this archive, Morales-Muniz APapers in this archive, Orlando LPapers in this archive, Pálsdóttir AHPapers in this archive, Reissmann MPapers in this archive, Ruttkay MPapers in this archive, Trinks APapers in this archive, Ludwig APapers in this archive
Abstract
Horses have been valued for their diversity of coat colour since prehistoric times; this is especially the case since their domestication in the Caspian steppe in ~3,500 BC. Although we can assume that human preferences were not constant, we have only anecdotal information about how domestic horses were influenced by humans. Our results from genotype analyses show a significant increase in spotted coats in early domestic horses (Copper Age to Iron Age). In contrast, medieval horses carried significantly fewer alleles for these phenotypes, whereas solid phenotypes (i.e., chestnut) became dominant. This shift may have been supported because of (i) pleiotropic disadvantages, (ii) a reduced need to separate domestic horses from their wild counterparts, (iii) a lower religious prestige, or (iv) novel developments in weaponry. These scenarios may have acted alone or in combination. However, the dominance of chestnut is a remarkable feature of the medieval horse population.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.