Language continuity despite population replacement in Remote Oceania
Posth CPapers in this archive, Nägele KPapers in this archive, Colleran HPapers in this archive, Valentin FPapers in this archive, Bedford SPapers in this archive, Kami KWPapers in this archive, Shing RPapers in this archive, Buckley HPapers in this archive, Kinaston RPapers in this archive, Walworth MPapers in this archive, Clark GRPapers in this archive, Reepmeyer CPapers in this archive, Flexner JPapers in this archive, Maric TPapers in this archive, Moser JPapers in this archive, Gresky JPapers in this archive, Kiko LPapers in this archive, Robson KJPapers in this archive, Auckland KPapers in this archive
Abstract
Recent genomic analyses show that the earliest peoples reaching Remote Oceania – associated with Austronesian-speaking Lapita culture – were almost completely East Asian, without detectable Papuan ancestry. Yet Papuan-related genetic ancestry is found across present-day Pacific populations, indicating that peoples from Near Oceania have played a significant – but largely unknown – ancestral role. Here, new genome-wide data from 19 South Pacific individuals provide direct evidence of a so-far undescribed Papuan expansion into Remote Oceania starting ~2,500 years before present, far earlier than previously estimated and supporting a model from historical linguistics. New genome-wide data from 27 contemporary ni-Vanuatu demonstrate a subsequent and almost complete replacement of Lapita-Austronesian by Near Oceanian ancestry. Despite this massive demographic change, incoming Papuan languages did not replace Austronesian languages. Population replacement with language continuity is extremely rare – if not unprecedented – in human history. Our analyses show that rather than one large-scale event, the process was incremental and complex, with repeated migrations and sex-biased admixture with peoples from the Bismarck Archipelago.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.