Did Our Species Evolve in Subdivided Populations across Africa, and Why Does It Matter?
Scerri EMLPapers in this archive, Thomas MGPapers in this archive, Manica APapers in this archive, Gunz PPapers in this archive, Stock JTPapers in this archive, Stringer CPapers in this archive, Grove MPapers in this archive, Groucutt HSPapers in this archive, Timmermann APapers in this archive, Rightmire GPPapers in this archive, d'Errico FPapers in this archive, Tryon CAPapers in this archive, Drake NAPapers in this archive, Brooks ASPapers in this archive, Dennell RWPapers in this archive, Durbin RPapers in this archive, Henn BMPapers in this archive, Lee-Thorp JPapers in this archive, deMenocal PPapers in this archive, Petraglia MDPapers in this archive, Thompson JCPapers in this archive, Scally APapers in this archive, Chikhi LPapers in this archive
Abstract
We challenge the view that our species, Homo sapiens, evolved within a single population and/or region of Africa. The chronology and physical diversity of Pleistocene human fossils suggest that morphologically varied populations pertaining to the H. sapiens clade lived throughout Africa. Similarly, the African archaeological record demonstrates the polycentric origin and persistence of regionally distinct Pleistocene material culture in a variety of paleoecological settings. Genetic studies also indicate that present-day population structure within Africa extends to deep times, paralleling a paleoenvironmental record of shifting and fractured habitable zones. We argue that these fields support an emerging view of a highly structured African prehistory that should be considered in human evolutionary inferences, prompting new interpretations, questions, and interdisciplinary research directions.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.