Discontinuities in quinoa biodiversity in the dry Andes: an 18-century perspective based on allelic genotyping
Winkel T, Aguirre MG, Arizio CM, Aschero CA, Babot MdP, Benoit L, Burgarella C, Costa-Tártara S, Dubois M, Gay L, Hocsman S, Jullien M, López-Campeny SML, Manifesto MM, Navascués M, Oliszewski N, Pintar E, Zenboudji S, Bertero HD, Joffre R.
Abstract
36 History and environment shape crop biodiversity, particularly in areas with vulnerable human communities and ecosystems. Tracing crop biodiversity over time helps understand how rural 38 societies cope with anthropogenic or climatic changes. Exceptionally well preserved ancient DNA of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) from the cold and arid Andes of Argentina has allowed us to 40 track changes and continuities in quinoa diversity over 18 centuries, by coupling genotyping of 157 ancient and modern seeds by 24 SSR markers with cluster and coalescence analyses. Cluster analyses 42 revealed clear population patterns separating modern and ancient quinoas. Coalescence-based analyses revealed that genetic drift within a single population cannot explain genetic differentiation 44 among ancient and modern quinoas. The hypothesis of a genetic bottleneck related to the Spanish Conquest also does not seem to apply at a local scale. Instead, the most likely scenario is the 46 replacement of preexisting quinoa gene pools with new ones of lower genetic diversity. This process occurred at least twice in the last 18 centuries: first, between the 6th and 12th centuries—a time of 48 agricultural intensification well before the Inka and Spanish conquests—and then between the 13th century and today—a period marked by farming marginalization in the late 19th century likely due to 50 a severe multidecadal drought. While these processes of local gene pool replacement do not imply losses of genetic diversity at the metapopulation scale, they support the view that gene pool 52 replacement linked to social and environmental changes can result from opposite agricultural trajectories. 54
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.