Reduced signal for polygenic adaptation of height in UK Biobank
Berg JJPapers in this archive, Harpak APapers in this archive, Sinnott-Armstrong NPapers in this archive, Joergensen AMPapers in this archive, Mostafavi HPapers in this archive, Field YPapers in this archive, Boyle EAPapers in this archive, Zhang XPapers in this archive, Racimo FPapers in this archive, Pritchard JKPapers in this archive, Coop GPapers in this archive
Abstract
Several recent papers have reported strong signals of selection on European polygenic height scores. These analyses used height effect estimates from the GIANT consortium and replication studies. Here, we describe a new analysis based on the the UK Biobank (UKB), a large, independent dataset. We find that the signals of selection using UKB effect estimates are strongly attenuated or absent. We also provide evidence that previous analyses were confounded by population stratification. Therefore, the conclusion of strong polygenic adaptation now lacks support. Moreover, these discrepancies highlight (1) that methods for correcting for population stratification in GWAS may not always be sufficient for polygenic trait analyses, and (2) that claims of differences in polygenic scores between populations should be treated with caution until these issues are better understood. Editorial note: This article has been through an editorial process in which the authors decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer review. The Reviewing Editor's assessment is that all the issues have been addressed (see decision letter).
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.