Craniometrics Reveal "Two Layers" of Prehistoric Human Dispersal in Eastern Eurasia
Matsumura HPapers in this archive, Hung HCPapers in this archive, Higham CPapers in this archive, Zhang CPapers in this archive, Yamagata MPapers in this archive, Nguyen LCPapers in this archive, Li ZPapers in this archive, Fan XCPapers in this archive, Simanjuntak TPapers in this archive, Oktaviana AAPapers in this archive, He JNPapers in this archive, Chen CYPapers in this archive, Pan CKPapers in this archive, He GPapers in this archive, Sun GPPapers in this archive, Huang WJPapers in this archive, Li XWPapers in this archive, Wei XTPapers in this archive, Domett KPapers in this archive, Halcrow SPapers in this archive, Nguyen KDPapers in this archive, Trinh HHPapers in this archive, Bui CHPapers in this archive, Nguyen KTKPapers in this archive, Reinecke APapers in this archive
Abstract
This cranio-morphometric study emphasizes a “two-layer model” for eastern Eurasian anatomically modern human (AMH) populations, based on large datasets of 89 population samples including findings directly from ancient archaeological contexts. Results suggest that an initial “first layer” of AMH had related closely to ancestral Andaman, Australian, Papuan, and Jomon groups who likely entered this region via the Southeast Asian landmass, prior to 65–50 kya. A later “second layer” shared strong cranial affinities with Siberians, implying a Northeast Asian source, evidenced by 9 kya in central China and then followed by expansions of descendant groups into Southeast Asia after 4 kya. These two populations shared limited initial exchange, and the second layer grew at a faster rate and in greater numbers, linked with contexts of farming that may have supported increased population densities. Clear dichotomization between the two layers implies a temporally deep divergence of distinct migration routes for AMH through both southern and northern Eurasia. Subject terms: Archaeology, Biological anthropology
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.