Ancient genomes from northern China suggest links between subsistence changes and human migration
Ning CPapers in this archive, Li TPapers in this archive, Wang KPapers in this archive, Zhang FPapers in this archive, Li TPapers in this archive, Wu XPapers in this archive, Gao SPapers in this archive, Zhang QPapers in this archive, Zhang HPapers in this archive, Hudson MJPapers in this archive, Dong GPapers in this archive, Wu SPapers in this archive, Fang YPapers in this archive, Liu CPapers in this archive, Feng CPapers in this archive, Li WPapers in this archive, Han TPapers in this archive, Li RPapers in this archive, Wei JPapers in this archive, Zhu YPapers in this archive, Zhou YPapers in this archive, Wang CCPapers in this archive, Fan SPapers in this archive, Xiong ZPapers in this archive, Sun ZPapers in this archive, Ye MPapers in this archive, Sun LPapers in this archive, Wu XPapers in this archive, Liang FPapers in this archive, Cao YPapers in this archive, Wei XPapers in this archive, Zhu HPapers in this archive, Zhou HPapers in this archive, Krause JPapers in this archive, Robbeets MPapers in this archive, Jeong CPapers in this archive, Cui YPapers in this archive
Abstract
Northern China harbored the world’s earliest complex societies based on millet farming, in two major centers in the Yellow (YR) and West Liao (WLR) River basins. Until now, their genetic histories have remained largely unknown. Here we present 55 ancient genomes dating to 7500-1700 BP from the YR, WLR, and Amur River (AR) regions. Contrary to the genetic stability in the AR, the YR and WLR genetic profiles substantially changed over time. The YR populations show a monotonic increase over time in their genetic affinity with present-day southern Chinese and Southeast Asians. In the WLR, intensification of farming in the Late Neolithic is correlated with increased YR affinity while the inclusion of a pastoral economy in the Bronze Age was correlated with increased AR affinity. Our results suggest a link between changes in subsistence strategy and human migration, and fuel the debate about archaeolinguistic signatures of past human migration.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.