Human auditory ossicles as an alternative optimal source of ancient DNA
Sirak KPapers in this archive, Fernandes DPapers in this archive, Cheronet OPapers in this archive, Harney EPapers in this archive, Mah MPapers in this archive, Mallick SPapers in this archive, Rohland NPapers in this archive, Adamski NPapers in this archive, Broomandkhoshbacht NPapers in this archive, Callan KPapers in this archive, Candilio FPapers in this archive, Lawson AMPapers in this archive, Mandl KPapers in this archive, Oppenheimer JPapers in this archive, Stewardson KPapers in this archive, Zalzala FPapers in this archive, Anders APapers in this archive, Bartík JPapers in this archive, Coppa APapers in this archive, Dashtseveg TPapers in this archive, Évinger SPapers in this archive, Farkaš ZPapers in this archive, Hajdu TPapers in this archive, Bayarsaikhan JPapers in this archive, McIntyre LPapers in this archive, Moiseyev VPapers in this archive
Abstract
DNA recovery from ancient human remains has revolutionized our ability to reconstruct the genetic landscape of the past. Ancient DNA research has benefited from the identification of skeletal elements, such as the cochlear part of the osseous inner ear, that provides optimal contexts for DNA preservation; however, the rich genetic information obtained from the cochlea must be counterbalanced against the loss of morphological information caused by its sampling. Motivated by similarities in developmental processes and histological properties between the cochlea and auditory ossicles, we evaluate the ossicles as an alternative source of ancient DNA. We show that ossicles perform comparably to the cochlea in terms of DNA recovery, finding no substantial reduction in data quantity and minimal differences in data quality across preservation conditions. Ossicles can be sampled from intact skulls or disarticulated petrous bones without damage to surrounding bone, and we argue that they should be used when available to reduce damage to human remains. Our results identify another optimal skeletal element for ancient DNA analysis and add to a growing toolkit of sampling methods that help to better preserve skeletal remains for future research while maximizing the likelihood that ancient DNA analysis will produce useable results.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.