Development of a small panel of SNPs to infer ancestry in Chileans that distinguishes Aymara and Mapuche components
Verdugo RAPapers in this archive, Di Genova APapers in this archive, Herrera LPapers in this archive, Moraga MPapers in this archive, Acuña MPapers in this archive, Berríos SPapers in this archive, Llop EPapers in this archive, Valenzuela CYPapers in this archive, Bustamante MLPapers in this archive, Digman DPapers in this archive, Symon APapers in this archive, Asenjo SPapers in this archive, López PPapers in this archive, Blanco APapers in this archive, Suazo JPapers in this archive, Barozet EPapers in this archive, Caba FPapers in this archive, Villalón MPapers in this archive, Alvarado SPapers in this archive, Cáceres DPapers in this archive, Salgado KPapers in this archive, Portales PPapers in this archive, Moreno-Estrada APapers in this archive, Gignoux CRPapers in this archive, Sandoval KPapers in this archive, Bustamante CDPapers in this archive, Eng CPapers in this archive, Huntsman SPapers in this archive, Burchard EGPapers in this archive, Loira NPapers in this archive, Maass APapers in this archive, Cifuentes LPapers in this archive
Abstract
Background Current South American populations trace their origins mainly to three continental ancestries, i.e. European, Amerindian and African. Individual variation in relative proportions of each of these ancestries may be confounded with socio-economic factors due to population stratification. Therefore, ancestry is a potential confounder variable that should be considered in epidemiologic studies and in public health plans. However, there are few studies that have assessed the ancestry of the current admixed Chilean population. This is partly due to the high cost of genome-scale technologies commonly used to estimate ancestry. In this study we have designed a small panel of SNPs to accurately assess ancestry in the largest sampling to date of the Chilean mestizo population (n = 3349) from eight cities. Our panel is also able to distinguish between the two main Amerindian components of Chileans: Aymara from the north and Mapuche from the south. Results A panel of 150 ancestry-informative markers (AIMs) of SNP type was selected to maximize ancestry informativeness and genome coverage. Of these, 147 were successfully genotyped by KASPar assays in 2843 samples, with an average missing rate of 0.012, and a 0.95 concordance with microarray data. The ancestries estimated with the panel of AIMs had relative high correlations (0.88 for European, 0.91 for Amerindian, 0.70 for Aymara, and 0.68 for Mapuche components) with those obtained with AXIOM LAT1 array. The country’s average ancestry was 0.53 ± 0.14 European, 0.04 ± 0.04 African, and 0.42 ± 0.14 Amerindian, disaggregated into 0.18 ± 0.15 Aymara and 0.25 ± 0.13 Mapuche. However, Mapuche ancestry was highest in the south (40.03%) and Aymara in the north (35.61%) as expected from the historical location of these ethnic groups. We make our results available through an online app and demonstrate how it can be used to adjust for ancestry when testing association between incidence of a disease and nongenetic risk factors. Conclusions We have conducted the most extensive sampling, across many different cities, of current Chilean population. Ancestry varied significantly by latitude and human development. The panel of AIMs is available to the community for estimating ancestry at low cost in Chileans and other populations with similar ancestry. Keywords: Chile, Admixture, Ancestry, Aymara, Mapuche, SNPs panel
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.