Leprosy in wild chimpanzees
Hockings KJPapers in this archive, Mubemba BPapers in this archive, Avanzi CPapers in this archive, Pleh KPapers in this archive, Düx APapers in this archive, Bersacola EPapers in this archive, Bessa JPapers in this archive, Ramon MPapers in this archive, Metzger SPapers in this archive, Patrono LVPapers in this archive, Jaffe JEPapers in this archive, Benjak APapers in this archive, Bonneaud CPapers in this archive, Busso PPapers in this archive, Couacy-Hymann EPapers in this archive, Gado MPapers in this archive, Gagneux SPapers in this archive, Johnson RCPapers in this archive, Kodio MPapers in this archive, Lynton-Jenkins JPapers in this archive, Morozova IPapers in this archive, Mätz-Rensing KPapers in this archive, Regalla APapers in this archive, Said ARPapers in this archive, Schuenemann VJPapers in this archive, Sow SOPapers in this archive, Spencer JSPapers in this archive, Ulrich MPapers in this archive, Zoubi HPapers in this archive, Cole STPapers in this archive, Wittig RMPapers in this archive, Calvignac-Spencer SPapers in this archive, Leendertz FHPapers in this archive
Abstract
Humans are considered as the main host for Mycobacterium leprae1, the aetiological agent of leprosy, but spillover has occurred to other mammals that are now maintenance hosts, such as nine-banded armadillos and red squirrels2,3. Although naturally acquired leprosy has also been described in captive nonhuman primates4–7, the exact origins of infection remain unclear. Here we describe leprosy-like lesions in two wild populations of western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau and Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa. Longitudinal monitoring of both populations revealed the progression of disease symptoms compatible with advanced leprosy. Screening of faecal and necropsy samples confirmed the presence of M. leprae as the causative agent at each site and phylogenomic comparisons with other strains from humans and other animals show that the chimpanzee strains belong to different and rare genotypes (4N/O and 2F). These findings suggest that M. leprae may be circulating in more wild animals than suspected, either as a result of exposure to humans or other unknown environmental sources.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.