The evolution of dog diet and foraging: Insights from archaeological canids in Siberia
Losey RJPapers in this archive, Nomokonova TPapers in this archive, Guiry EPapers in this archive, Fleming LSPapers in this archive, Garvie-Lok SJPapers in this archive, Waters-Rist ALPapers in this archive, Bieraugle MPapers in this archive, Szpak PPapers in this archive, Bachura OPPapers in this archive, Bazaliiskii VIPapers in this archive, Berdnikova NEPapers in this archive, Diatchina NGPapers in this archive, Frolov IVPapers in this archive, Gorbunov VVPapers in this archive, Goriunova OIPapers in this archive, Grushin SPPapers in this archive, Gusev AVPapers in this archive, Iaroslavtseva LGPapers in this archive, Ivanov GLPapers in this archive, Kharinskii AVPapers in this archive, Konstantinov MVPapers in this archive, Kosintsev PAPapers in this archive, Kovychev EVPapers in this archive, Lazin BPapers in this archive, Nikitin IGPapers in this archive, Papin DVPapers in this archive, Popov ANPapers in this archive, Sablin MVPapers in this archive, Savel'ev NAPapers in this archive, Savinetsky ABPapers in this archive, Tishkin AAPapers in this archive
Abstract
Research on the evolution of dog foraging and diet has largely focused on scavenging during their initial domestication and genetic adaptations to starch-rich food environments following the advent of agriculture. The Siberian archaeological record evidences other critical shifts in dog foraging and diet that likely characterize Holocene dogs globally. By the Middle Holocene, body size reconstruction for Siberia dogs indicates that most were far smaller than Pleistocene wolves. This contributed to dogs’ tendencies to scavenge, feed on small prey, and reduce social foraging. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of Siberian dogs reveals that their diets were more diverse than those of Pleistocene wolves. This included habitual consumption of marine and freshwater foods by the Middle Holocene and reliance on C4 foods by the Late Holocene. Feeding on such foods and anthropogenic waste increased dogs’ exposure to microbes, affected their gut microbiomes, and shaped long-term dog population history.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.