Optimized in-solution enrichment of over a million ancient human SNPs
Davidson R, Roca-Rada X, Ravishankar S, Taufik L, Haarkötter C, Collen E, Williams MP, Webb P, Mahmud MI, Djami ENI, Purnomo GA, Santos C, Malgosa A, Manzanilla LR, Silva AM, Tereso S, Matos V, Carvalho PC, Fernandes T, Maurer AF, Teixeira JC, Tobler R, Fehren-Schmitz L, Llamas B.
Abstract
Background In-solution hybridization enrichment of genetic markers is a method of choice in paleogenomic studies, where the DNA of interest is generally heavily fragmented and contaminated with environmental DNA, and where the retrieval of genetic data comparable between individuals is challenging. Here, we benchmark the commercial “Twist Ancient DNA” reagent from Twist Biosciences using sequencing libraries from ancient human samples of diverse demographic origin with low to high endogenous DNA content (0.1–44%). For each library, we tested one and two rounds of enrichment and assessed performance compared to deep shotgun sequencing. Results We find that the “Twist Ancient DNA” assay provides robust enrichment of approximately 1.2M target SNPs without introducing allelic bias that may interfere with downstream population genetics analyses. Additionally, we show that pooling up to 4 sequencing libraries and performing two rounds of enrichment is both reliable and cost-effective for libraries with less than 27% endogenous DNA content. Above 38% endogenous content, a maximum of one round of enrichment is recommended for cost-effectiveness and to preserve library complexity. Conclusions In conclusion, we provide researchers in the field of human paleogenomics with a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of different sequencing and enrichment strategies, and our results offer practical guidance for optimizing experimental protocols. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13059-025-03622-6. Keywords: Ancient DNA, Enrichment, Population genetics, Human paleogenomics
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.