Genomic and morphological analysis reveals long-term mammoth hybridization in British Columbia, Canada
Dehasque MPapers in this archive, van der Valk TPapers in this archive, Chacón-Duque JCPapers in this archive, Termes LPapers in this archive, Larsson PPapers in this archive, Moots HMPapers in this archive, Tubbesing FPapers in this archive, Larsdotter JPapers in this archive, Oteo-García GPapers in this archive, Moreland KPapers in this archive, van Essen HPapers in this archive, Arbour VPapers in this archive, Keddie GPapers in this archive, Richards MPPapers in this archive, Díez-Del-Molino DPapers in this archive, Heintzman PDPapers in this archive, Lister APapers in this archive, Dalén LPapers in this archive
Abstract
Climate changes profoundly impact species distributions and can drastically alter dynamics between formerly isolated taxa. The evolution of mammoths within North America was characterized by repeated cycles of dispersal and putative gene flow between woolly and Columbian mammoths. However, as genome-wide studies on mammoths have predominantly focused on Siberia, the consequences of these North American range shifts remain unclear. Here, we generated genome-wide and morphological data for two Late Pleistocene mammoth molars from British Columbia, Canada (BC), and jointly analysed these with previously published data. Our genome-wide analysis (n = 16) revealed gene flow between woolly and Columbian mammoths that would have gone undiscovered based on morphological (n = 48) and mitochondrial analysis (n = 124) alone. Consistent with their hybrid nature, our analyses suggest that these two BC mammoths had elevated genomic diversity. Our results highlight the importance of combining data types to reconstruct past evolutionary events. These findings demonstrate how the geographical range expansion of woolly mammoths resulted in long-term hybridization with local Columbian mammoths and enhance our understanding of the genomic and morphological consequences of climate-mediated dispersal.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.