FIGG at 5: An update on U.S. public perspectives on forensic investigative genetic genealogy five years after its introduction to criminal investigations
Guerrini CJPapers in this archive, Robinson JOPapers in this archive, Elsaid MIPapers in this archive, Brooks WBPapers in this archive, Levchenko APapers in this archive, Fullerton SMPapers in this archive, Huston SPapers in this archive, Crossnohere NLPapers in this archive, Bridges JFPPapers in this archive, Dahlquist JMPapers in this archive, Kalokairinou LPapers in this archive, Madden DPapers in this archive, Moore CPapers in this archive, McGuire ALPapers in this archive
Abstract
In 2018, after law enforcement announced it had used a technique called forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG) to identify the Golden State Killer, we conducted a U.S. general population survey and found most respondents supported using FIGG to solve violent crimes. Since then, FIGG has helped close hundreds of criminal cases, but it also has weathered controversies. On FIGG’s fifth anniversary, we conducted an expanded, follow-up survey with U.S.-based participants to determine if public opinion had changed and found continued support for FIGG across most applications. The same proportion (91 %) of respondents in the 2018 and 2023 surveys endorsed using FIGG in genetic genealogy databases to help identify perpetrators of violent crimes. Similar to the 2018 survey, only 57 % of respondents supported FIGG to help identify perpetrators of non-violent crimes. The results indicate that U.S. policies that have been adopted for FIGG are generally consistent with the opinions of our survey respondents over time. Nonetheless, there are opportunities to strengthen FIGG governance with the goal of maintaining public trust in the technique.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.