Genetic disease risks of under-represented founder populations in New York City
Isshiki MPapers in this archive, Griffen AJPapers in this archive, Meissner PPapers in this archive, Spencer PPapers in this archive, Cabana MDPapers in this archive, Klugman SDPapers in this archive, Colón MPapers in this archive, Maksumova ZPapers in this archive, Suglia SPapers in this archive, Isasi CRPapers in this archive, Greally JMPapers in this archive, Raj SMPapers in this archive
Abstract
The detection of founder pathogenic variants, those observed in high frequency only in a group of individuals with increased inter-relatedness, can help improve delivery of health care for that community. We identified 16 groups with shared ancestry, based on genomic segments that are shared through identity by descent (IBD), in New York City using the genomic data of 25,366 residents from the All Of Us Research Program and the Mount Sinai BioMe biobank. From these groups we defined 7 as founder populations, mostly communities currently under-represented in medical genomics research, such as Puerto Rican and Garifuna. The enrichment analysis of ClinVar pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in each group identified 201 of these damaging variants across the seven founder populations. We confirmed disease-causing variants previously reported to occur at increased frequencies in Ashkenazi Jewish and Puerto Rican genetic ancestry groups, but most of the damaging variants identified have not been previously associated with any such founder populations, and most of these founder populations have not been described to have increased prevalence of the associated rare disease. Twenty-two of 47 variants meeting Tier 2 prenatal screening criteria (1/100 carrier frequency within these founder groups) have never previously been reported. We show how population structure studies can provide insights into rare diseases disproportionately affecting under-represented founder populations, delivering a health care benefit but also a potential source of stigmatization of these communities, who should be part of the decision-making about implementation into health care delivery.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.