Whole-genome ancestry of an Old Kingdom Egyptian
Morez Jacobs APapers in this archive, Irish JDPapers in this archive, Cooke APapers in this archive, Anastasiadou KPapers in this archive, Barrington CPapers in this archive, Gilardet APapers in this archive, Kelly MPapers in this archive, Silva MPapers in this archive, Speidel LPapers in this archive, Tait FPapers in this archive, Williams MPapers in this archive, Brucato NPapers in this archive, Ricaut FXPapers in this archive, Wilkinson CPapers in this archive, Madgwick RPapers in this archive, Holt EPapers in this archive, Nederbragt AJPapers in this archive, Inglis EPapers in this archive, Hajdinjak MPapers in this archive, Skoglund PPapers in this archive, Girdland-Flink LPapers in this archive
Abstract
Ancient Egyptian society flourished for millennia, reaching its peak during the Dynastic Period (approximately 3150–30 bce). However, owing to poor DNA preservation, questions about regional interconnectivity over time have not been addressed because whole-genome sequencing has not yet been possible. Here we sequenced a 2× coverage whole genome from an adult male Egyptian excavated at Nuwayrat (Nuerat, نويرات). Radiocarbon dated to 2855–2570 cal. bce, he lived a few centuries after Egyptian unification, bridging the Early Dynastic and Old Kingdom periods. The body was interred in a ceramic pot within a rock-cut tomb1, potentially contributing to the DNA preservation. Most of his genome is best represented by North African Neolithic ancestry, among available sources at present. Yet approximately 20% of his genetic ancestry can be traced to genomes representing the eastern Fertile Crescent, including Mesopotamia and surrounding regions. This genetic affinity is similar to the ancestry appearing in Anatolia and the Levant during the Neolithic and Bronze Age2–5. Although more genomes are needed to fully understand the genomic diversity of early Egyptians, our results indicate that contacts between Egypt and the eastern Fertile Crescent were not limited to objects and imagery (such as domesticated animals and plants, as well as writing systems)6–9 but also encompassed human migration.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.