The Japanese Archipelago sheltered cave lions, not tigers, during the Late Pleistocene
Sun XPapers in this archive, Peng LPapers in this archive, Tsutaya TPapers in this archive, Jiangzuo QPapers in this archive, Hasegawa YPapers in this archive, Hou YPapers in this archive, Han YPapers in this archive, Zhuang YPapers in this archive, Ramos Madrigal JPapers in this archive, Taurozzi AJPapers in this archive, Mackie MPapers in this archive, Trochė GPapers in this archive, Olsen JVPapers in this archive, Cappellini EPapers in this archive, O'Brien SJPapers in this archive, Gilbert MTPPapers in this archive, Yamaguchi NPapers in this archive, Luo SJPapers in this archive
Abstract
Lions and tigers were widespread apex predators during the Late Pleistocene and integral components of East Asian megafauna. Cave lions predominantly inhabited northern Eurasia, whereas tigers were distributed farther south. The boundary between their ranges extended across Eurasia and shifted with climatic fluctuations, such as glacial–interglacial oscillations. Our findings challenge the prevailing view that tigers once took refuge in Japan and that cave lion distribution was limited to the Russian Far East and northeast China. These findings provide evidence that lions, rather than tigers, colonized the Japanese Archipelago during the Late Pleistocene. This finding extends the known range of cave lions in East Asia and refines our understanding of how far south the lion–tiger transition belt shifted during this period.
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.