Microstratigraphic preservation of ancient faunal and hominin DNA in Pleistocene cave sediments
Massilani DPapers in this archive, Morley MWPapers in this archive, Mentzer SMPapers in this archive, Aldeias VPapers in this archive, Vernot BPapers in this archive, Miller CPapers in this archive, Stahlschmidt MPapers in this archive, Kozlikin MBPapers in this archive, Shunkov MVPapers in this archive, Derevianko APPapers in this archive, Conard NJPapers in this archive, Wurz SPapers in this archive, Henshilwood CSPapers in this archive, Vasquez JPapers in this archive, Essel EPapers in this archive, Nagel SPapers in this archive, Richter JPapers in this archive, Nickel BPapers in this archive, Roberts RGPapers in this archive, Pääbo SPapers in this archive, Slon VPapers in this archive, Goldberg PPapers in this archive, Meyer MPapers in this archive
Abstract
DNA preserved in sediments has emerged as an important source of information about past ecosystems, independent of the discovery of skeletal remains. However, little is known about the sources of sediment DNA, the factors affecting its long-term preservation, and the extent to which it may be translocated after deposition. Here, we show that impregnated blocks of intact sediment are excellent archives of DNA. DNA distribution is highly heterogeneous at the microscale in the cave sediment we studied, suggesting that postdepositional movement of DNA is unlikely to be a common phenomenon in cases where the stratigraphy is undisturbed. Combining micromorphological analysis with microstratigraphic retrieval of ancient DNA therefore allows genetic information to be associated with the detailed archaeological and ecological record preserved in sediments. Keywords: ancient DNA, sediment DNA, sediment curation, soil micromorphology, Denisova Cave
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.