Ancient human DNA recovered from a Palaeolithic pendant
Essel EPapers in this archive, Zavala EIPapers in this archive, Schulz-Kornas EPapers in this archive, Kozlikin MBPapers in this archive, Fewlass HPapers in this archive, Vernot BPapers in this archive, Shunkov MVPapers in this archive, Derevianko APPapers in this archive, Douka KPapers in this archive, Barnes IPapers in this archive, Soulier MCPapers in this archive, Schmidt APapers in this archive, Szymanski MPapers in this archive, Tsanova TPapers in this archive, Sirakov NPapers in this archive, Endarova EPapers in this archive, McPherron SPPapers in this archive, Hublin JJPapers in this archive, Kelso JPapers in this archive, Pääbo SPapers in this archive, Hajdinjak MPapers in this archive, Soressi MPapers in this archive, Meyer MPapers in this archive
Abstract
Artefacts made from stones, bones and teeth are fundamental to our understanding of human subsistence strategies, behaviour and culture in the Pleistocene. Although these resources are plentiful, it is impossible to associate artefacts to specific human individuals1 who can be morphologically or genetically characterized, unless they are found within burials, which are rare in this time period. Thus, our ability to discern the societal roles of Pleistocene individuals based on their biological sex or genetic ancestry is limited2–5. Here we report the development of a non-destructive method for the gradual release of DNA trapped in ancient bone and tooth artefacts. Application of the method to an Upper Palaeolithic deer tooth pendant from Denisova Cave, Russia, resulted in the recovery of ancient human and deer mitochondrial genomes, which allowed us to estimate the age of the pendant at approximately 19,000–25,000 years. Nuclear DNA analysis identifies the presumed maker or wearer of the pendant as a female individual with strong genetic affinities to a group of Ancient North Eurasian individuals who lived around the same time but were previously found only further east in Siberia. Our work redefines how cultural and genetic records can be linked in prehistoric archaeology. Subject terms: Evolutionary genetics, Palaeontology, Population genetics, Archaeology, Anthropology
This page indexes the study's public bibliographic record. The full text belongs to the journal; follow the DOI above to read it at the source.